PUYALLUP CITY COUNCIL: what Bellingham’s city council and mayor did was inspiring
Last night was a mega-victory in our ongoing battle against those obnoxious ticketing cameras which is simply a taxation-through-citation scheme, another way for politicians to pick the taxpayers’ pockets. We are thrilled.
Bellingham Ends Photo Ticketing Contract
THE NEWSPAPER, TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2012
The city council in Bellingham voted 6-1 Monday night to respect the wishes of voters and pull out of a red light camera and speed camera contract. The city entered an agreement with American Traffic Solutions (ATS) in May 2011 to install the devices, ignoring local activists who had been collecting signatures for a ballot measure opposing camera use.
After a long and drawn out legal battle, the camera ban was placed on the ballot as an advisory measure in November and earned 68 percent of the vote. The same election replaced then-Mayor Dan Pike, the man responsible for the camera contract, with Mayor Kelli Linville who said during the campaign that the cameras were a mistake.
“I think that the mayor and the city council need to pay a lot of attention about what the public thinks about this,” Linville said during an October 21 debate. “I personally don’t think that it’s a good way to generate revenue. The studies show it’s not necessarily a good way to make them safer.”
Linville and the council approved a settlement that gives ATS $100,000 to break the contract.
FROM THE BELLINGHAM HERALD: The money paid to ATS will come from the general fund reserves, but staffing changes she instituted in the mayor’s office will save more than that amount each year, Linville said. The dollar amount was a product of negotiations, she said, with the city starting with a lower number and ATS starting with a higher number.
Bellingham would have paid ATS more than $450,000 per year for the cameras. Linville said ATS was willing to approve the new deal because several communities in Washington state have had problems installing and keeping the cameras, and the company knew she didn’t support the program. … “I believe the approach we have crafted together is fair to both parties and, most importantly, supports our citizens’ wishes,” Linville said in the release. “In working through this matter, American Traffic Solutions has acted as a responsive, respectful vendor and I appreciate the company’s willingness to work with us.”
— END —
L.A. cops say “shut the cameras down”
Citing costs and safety issues, the Police Commission votes to shut the cameras down.
Councilman Dennis Zine commended the commission’s decision, calling the camera program flawed and a waste of taxpayer money. “It’s a dishonest program,” said Zine, a former traffic cop. “This thing really mocks the public.”
Commissioner Debra Wong Yang. “And I’m not convinced from looking at the numbers that these cameras work.”
Councilman Greig Smith, who heads the council’s Public Safety Committee, agreed with the commission, adding that the cameras had only a “marginal” effect on traffic safety and said he doubted that his colleagues on the City Council would find the 10 votes needed to overturn the commission’s decision. “I don’t think anyone on the council wants to get up and be the proponent of bringing it back to life,” he said. “No one’s been a big fan over here.”
Hollywood resident Christina Heller, 27. “These cameras remove our fundamental right in this country to confront our accuser. And they do not do anything to improve safety.”